South Africa’s urgent need for Affordable Housing redesign

South Africa is grappling with a severe housing crisis, with a backlog of at least 2.2 million units.

The most pressing issue lies within the "gap market," which consists of households earning too much to qualify for state-funded housing (Reconstruction and Development Programme - RDP) but too little to afford homes in the open market.

The Gist‍

• Affordable Housing Shortage: South Africa faces a 2.2 million-unit housing backlog, with a severe gap in affordable housing for middle-income earners.
• Market Design Issues: Complex eviction processes and high transaction costs disincentivize private investment, hindering affordable housing supply despite significant demand.
• Subsidy Problems: Government’s First Home Finance subsidy faces inefficiencies and administrative complexities, leaving millions unclaimed, and hindering housing market participation.

A recent study by the Centre for Affordable Housing Finance (CAHF) highlights this disparity, underlining the need for a strategic overhaul of the country’s housing policies.

The Gap Housing Market: A Critical Issue

Renier Kriek, Managing Director of Sentinel Homes, explains that 40% of consumers fall into the RDP category, where household incomes are below R3,500 per month.

Conversely, the wealthiest 30% of households are adequately served by the open housing market. The gap market - the middle 30% - has an extreme shortage of housing, a situation that worsens despite substantial demand. According to Kriek, the primary reason for this imbalance is a market design failure, which discourages investment in affordable housing.

One of the key obstacles to addressing this issue is the prohibitively high costs associated with evictions and foreclosures. The lengthy and expensive processes of resetting housing transactions (through eviction or foreclosure) act as a major deterrent to private capital investment in affordable housing. Kriek advocates for a regulatory shift that favours private sector investment and aims to increase the housing supply.

A Bold Proposal for Policy Change

Kriek suggests a radical, yet potentially effective solution: reducing the transaction costs for capital holders in order to encourage more risk-taking in the affordable housing market.

He argues that the current policy environment, which places too much emphasis on tenure security, keeps people from moving into the formal housing market. While this solution may seem counterintuitive, Kriek believes it’s a better alternative than maintaining restrictive policies that prevent people from entering the housing market at all.

He questions the value of being born "free" if citizens are unable to access the constitutional right to adequate housing due to systemic barriers.

Government Subsidies: Unintended Consequences

Another major issue in South Africa’s housing crisis is the inefficiency of government subsidies aimed at assisting the gap market.

The Department of Human Settlements provides the First Home Finance (FHF) subsidy to first-time homebuyers earning between R3,501 and R22,000 per month.

However, millions of rands designated for this subsidy remain unclaimed due to a combination of poor demand and disincentives for private sector involvement.

Kriek points out that the scarcity of available gap housing stock, along with incentives that deter investment, limits the effectiveness of the FHF subsidy. Additionally, the subsidy process itself is overly complex. The government requires that the registered title deed include the name of the subsidy recipient before the funds are released, which creates delays in payments.

Unlike other property transaction funds that are processed quickly through third-party intermediaries like banks or attorneys, the delay in subsidy payments makes the entire process cumbersome and less appealing for estate agents and other market participants. This disincentivizes them from working with subsidy recipients, further exacerbating the gap housing issue.

Moreover, the subsidy administration is fragmented, with a national subsidy authority and separate provincial authorities, each operating under different rules and procedures. This bureaucratic maze makes it difficult for low-income consumers to navigate the system and access the benefits intended for them.

The need for Political will and market solutions

Kriek acknowledges that addressing these systemic issues will require significant political will and the courage to implement substantial regulatory changes.

He fears that the current government may lack both the understanding of the problem and the political capital needed to effect change. However, he is optimistic that successful policy redesign could lead to significant job creation, which would align with the government’s broader economic goals outlined in the President’s State of the Nation Address.

In conclusion, the critical issue facing South Africa’s housing sector is not just a lack of affordable homes, but a flawed market design that disincentivizes investment and burdens consumers with unnecessary complexity. To tackle this issue effectively, policymakers must rethink current strategies, prioritize investment, and streamline subsidy processes.

The potential benefits are immense - not only in terms of providing housing for millions of South Africans but also in stimulating broader economic growth through job creation and improved access to homeownership.

‍